|
Post by libgirl2 on Apr 29, 2019 17:49:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Amy Lee on Apr 29, 2019 18:17:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by betty80 on Apr 30, 2019 21:49:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by momrek06 on Apr 30, 2019 23:17:17 GMT
So he is not entirely FIRED from the article. That he will not be in the opening weeks. Hmmm. "A spokesperson for Smollett said in a statement, “We’ve been told that Jussie will not be on ‘Empire’ in the beginning of the season but he appreciates they have extended his contract to keep Jamal’s future open."Well let's see.......who else does LE have that would have done this to JS??? Its like the OJ case.......who else is still out there that might have killed Nicole??? I seriously think this is an absolute no brainer that JS did all this and yet there is a possibility EMPIRE might let him back on PRIME TIME TV??? I think JS needs to be out of the limelight for a solid year. In the meantime Chicago is still trying to figure this all out. Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx subpoenaed over Jussie Smollett case: reportwww.foxnews.com/us/kim-foxx-subpoena-smollett-special-counsel
|
|
|
Post by momrek06 on Apr 30, 2019 23:53:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by MissGriss on May 1, 2019 10:55:55 GMT
Shortly after the whole scandal broke, I was talking to a guy who works with college admissions testing, and I asked him what he thought of it all. He said that stuff like this has been going on forever.
|
|
|
Post by momrek06 on May 1, 2019 15:30:11 GMT
Shortly after the whole scandal broke, I was talking to a guy who works with college admissions testing, and I asked him what he thought of it all. He said that stuff like this has been going on forever. OMG.
|
|
|
Post by betty80 on May 1, 2019 16:21:01 GMT
i wonder if thees parents have to continue to pay people to help their children through college. If they couldn't get in on their own, they may not be able to succeed once they get there.
|
|
|
Post by FireWoman on May 1, 2019 20:40:26 GMT
Shortly after the whole scandal broke, I was talking to a guy who works with college admissions testing, and I asked him what he thought of it all. He said that stuff like this has been going on forever. Yeah, not at all shocking. There are more legit ways to hide the fact that is what you are doing however. Most of it never makes news because there are not the multitude of celeb names involved in one type of scandal. People pay for buildings and naming rights all the time and lookie there... whos kid just got into Yale or Princeton, etc.. Favors and cash are exchanged all the time. The "Varsity Blues" mess was a multi layer scam and involved so many people and that's why we are hearing about it. Lesson to learn, if your kid can't get in to the school on their own, best not to bribe them in lol.
|
|
|
Post by momrek06 on May 2, 2019 0:25:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by momrek06 on May 2, 2019 8:17:20 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Kao on May 2, 2019 14:30:15 GMT
I think they planned to have a bigger ceremony but after his brother and Priyanka's 543987 sponsored weddings decided to opt out of that mess, lol.
|
|
|
Post by acookertv on May 2, 2019 15:28:53 GMT
This gives her something to talk about during the promotion for Dark Phoenix. Then once that is done, if they still want to have the big party in France, they can.
|
|
|
Post by Kao on May 2, 2019 16:20:40 GMT
He's going on a 45 city tour beginning next week. Between that and the Dark Phoenix promo they probably wanted to get the wedding out of the way. Plus there's just something so kitsch about getting married by Elvis in Las Vegas. They're a fun couple, and I can see why that would be appealing.
|
|
|
Post by AZChristian on May 2, 2019 16:58:53 GMT
I can't figure out how a college administrator got a mortgage for a $2,000,000 mansion based on her verifiable income from the university. LL's girls weren't the first she accepted bribes for. Maybe she put down some of that $1,300,000 in bribe money as a big down payment so that her mortgage was done to a level she could qualify for. Let the heads continue to roll!!!
|
|
|
Post by MissGriss on May 2, 2019 19:43:31 GMT
I keep seeing stories saying that Gwen Stefani is trying to get pregnant with Blake. I find it hard to believe that she really wants to have a baby at 49. Anyone out there buying this?
|
|
|
Post by acookertv on May 2, 2019 19:45:42 GMT
Isn't there a rule in tabloid journalism that if a woman is with a man for more than six months she MUST be trying to get pregnant ... because tabloids teach all women that we're never validated if we don't have children?
|
|
mika06
FORT Regular
Posts: 342
|
Post by mika06 on May 2, 2019 20:44:13 GMT
They are both up there in age but I know she had wanted a girl. But I'm sure if she couldn't get pregnant they would just get a surrogate though. You would be surprised how many people in their late 40s still actively look to get pregnant.
|
|
|
Post by Imperfect1 on May 3, 2019 3:43:24 GMT
I haven't been able to watch The Talk since Julie left, but now with Marie coming on the show, YAY, I love Marie and will love every minute with her on the panel!!!
|
|
|
Post by Imperfect1 on May 3, 2019 3:45:06 GMT
Isn't there a rule in tabloid journalism that if a woman is with a man for more than six months she MUST be trying to get pregnant ... because tabloids teach all women that we're never validated if we don't have children? You're kidding, right, acookertv?
|
|
|
Post by MissGriss on May 3, 2019 4:06:11 GMT
Isn't there a rule in tabloid journalism that if a woman is with a man for more than six months she MUST be trying to get pregnant ... because tabloids teach all women that we're never validated if we don't have children? You're kidding, right, acookertv? I'm pretty sure there's a large dose of snark in that post.
|
|
|
Post by MissGriss on May 3, 2019 4:08:17 GMT
They are both up there in age but I know she had wanted a girl. But I'm sure if she couldn't get pregnant they would just get a surrogate though. You would be surprised how many people in their late 40s still actively look to get pregnant. Thanks for that perspective. It never occurred to me that someone would want a new baby at that age. Guess I was wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Kao on May 3, 2019 4:21:59 GMT
They are both up there in age but I know she had wanted a girl. But I'm sure if she couldn't get pregnant they would just get a surrogate though. You would be surprised how many people in their late 40s still actively look to get pregnant. Thanks for that perspective. It never occurred to me that someone would want a new baby at that age. Guess I was wrong. The age for first time mothers is shifting older now. Lots of women waiting to get married later (if ever) and lots of women waiting until late 30s-early 40s to have children.
|
|
|
Post by sweetmermaid1 on May 3, 2019 5:35:17 GMT
I haven't been able to watch The Talk since Julie left, but now with Marie coming on the show, YAY, I love Marie and will love every minute with her on the panel!!! I think the last time I saw Marie Osmond was when she used to sell dolls on qvc. I'm not a doll person (They kind of creep me out) so I never really watched her. Is she interesting enough to replace Sara?
|
|
|
Post by MissGriss on May 3, 2019 5:49:17 GMT
Thanks for that perspective. It never occurred to me that someone would want a new baby at that age. Guess I was wrong. The age for first time mothers is shifting older now. Lots of women waiting to get married later (if ever) and lots of women waiting until late 30s-early 40s to have children. Yeah. I know a lot who are having babies in their late 30s and early 40s. I just didn't think anyone would want to have a baby at 50, which is what Gwen would be if she got pregnant now, but it sounds like there are women who aren't afraid to take that on at her age, so good for them.
|
|
|
Post by sweetmermaid1 on May 3, 2019 6:13:04 GMT
What do they expect the outcome to be?? That they will have Ivy school educated children? No you're going to have the same poorly educated children that now have a sense of entitlement thanks to you.
|
|
|
Post by acookertv on May 3, 2019 9:49:09 GMT
You're kidding, right, acookertv? I'm pretty sure there's a large dose of snark in that post. You are correct!
|
|
mika06
FORT Regular
Posts: 342
|
Post by mika06 on May 3, 2019 11:55:00 GMT
The age for first time mothers is shifting older now. Lots of women waiting to get married later (if ever) and lots of women waiting until late 30s-early 40s to have children. Yeah. I know a lot who are having babies in their late 30s and early 40s. I just didn't think anyone would want to have a baby at 50, which is what Gwen would be if she got pregnant now, but it sounds like there are women who aren't afraid to take that on at her age, so good for them. Yeah I was only aware of that since my Divorce. I started dating someone 5 years younger, who has no kids and is in no rush either. I joined some Facebook groups when I realized I may not get pregnant again until my early 40s but actually there are more women in their late 40s in the groups then early 40s trying to get pregnant a lot of them finding their partners later in life.
|
|
|
Post by Imperfect1 on May 4, 2019 23:19:03 GMT
I haven't been able to watch The Talk since Julie left, but now with Marie coming on the show, YAY, I love Marie and will love every minute with her on the panel!!! I think the last time I saw Marie Osmond was when she used to sell dolls on qvc. I'm not a doll person (They kind of creep me out) so I never really watched her. Is she interesting enough to replace Sara? I really like Sara as a 'person' and as an actress. She's really fabulous on The Connors! BUT I don't care for her as head co-anchor on The View, who reads all of the topics the panel discusses. I think on the show she's as dull as dishwater. Marie Osmond is perky and fun and can be really charming. I think she MORE than enough to replace Sara.
|
|
|
Post by redsoxgirl on May 5, 2019 23:48:38 GMT
I think celebrities who have kids when they are older simply drop them off in the laps of the hired help. The celebrities bring the kids out for photo ops. That's about it.
|
|